There are prominent scholars who argue that no earth-shaking event took
place after Jesus’ death, except for some compelling visions and dreams. According to
them, the apostles felt that Jesus was still with them spiritually, and over the years the Church
came up with the tradition of him being raised physically. They think that this is the most beautiful
interpretation of Jesus’ story, because it gives him back his exceptional value as a human
being.
Other scholars strongly believe that this version of the birth of Christianity is just not good
enough and I agree with them, because to see Jesus as nothing but a moral teacher
leads inevitably to a complete distortion of the circumstances of his death. The truth is
that a Messiah was awaited and Jesus’ disciples thought he was the one. His crucifixion, given
their religious belief, could only mean that they were mistaken, for the Messiah was not supposed to
die, especially not by the hands of the Romans. This is why any historian who looks at the
gospels through the eye of a first century Jew knows that something must have happened to bring the
apostles back to their first conviction, namely that Jesus was the awaited Messiah. Love was simply not enough to motivate them, in fact they fled when he was arrested and he died
alone.
The birth of the Church is not
the only event that it’s difficult to explain if one rules out the resurrection. Anyone who knows something about ancient Jews will find
hard to believe that, almost overnight, they began to worship a human being as divine. They
considered the pagan idea that gods can take human guise as blasphemous, yet they called
Jesus the Son of God. For Jesus, the disciples completely transformed the basic shape of their
messianic belief, namely accepted a Messiah who would bring peace and justice to the entire
world and not only to the Jews. He would not rebuild a temple in Jerusalem, but a community of
disciples instead. He would not fight a war, but the Devil himself.
According to Harris, in the modern Eastern world there are people who
are said to perform miracles and to have resurrected after death. I’ve read of a Tibetan
woman named Dawa Drolma (her son is still alive), who died at the age of sixteen and came back
to life five days later. She was clinically dead but her body remained intact, so her family didn’t
give her burial. She returned to the physical world with a deep understanding of the
afterlife. Although Tibetan Lamas were not inclined to give prominence to a woman, they had to
recognize her inexplicable knowledge of Buddhist theology and her paranormal abilities. I bet
Harris wouldn’t have too many problems believing this story and, as a matter of fact, I don’t
either. Why should I, if all miracles come from God? Harris wonders why an Indian guru who is said
to have returned from the dead doesn’t become the center of a worldwide religion. The answer
is that we don’t believe that Jesus is the Son of God because
he was raised and God was the doer of his resurrection. I wouldn’t even believe there is a God if Jesus hadn’t come on earth. We
don’t believe because of what he said and did, for we are hardly able to understand its meaning.
We believe because his whole life and death awaken
something so compelling in our heart that
nothing we experienced before has ever been even remotely close to it. This is the grace
people of faith talk about. We believe because Jesus lives inside of us. There is no other reason.
1 comment:
Excellent! Followers of Jesus went to their deaths after the resurrection. They would not have done it on just impressions, and the faith could not have spread as it did. Jews and Gentiles both would not have become Christians by a myth. There were myths all around them. Another one, especially one about a poor laborer who got himself crucified, would not have convinced many.
Post a Comment